tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6947903.post3523649475564899635..comments2010-11-15T22:40:35.017Znichttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08171287466268391184noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6947903.post-70858679539058004502010-11-15T22:40:35.017Z2010-11-15T22:40:35.017ZIf the current judicially imposed arrangement on privacy were enacted into the statute law, but with the burden of proof in libel actions placed on the plaintiff, then who could object to that? And why?<br /><br />Making the privacy law statutory as the price of reversing the burden of proof in libel actions. That would be the deal. The corporate media cannot expect their own way all the time.David Lindsayhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06839882674758833524noreply@blogger.com